1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
3 years ago
11

The American legal system is based on a passive judge and jury seeiding to find the truth as attorneys for each side argue Vigor

ously
True
False
Law
1 answer:
Hoochie [10]3 years ago
8 0
True Because the legal system lets you
You might be interested in
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
3 years ago
***50 POINTS***
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Double jeopardy will most likely prevent Don Long from being tried twice.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the agencies that interpret law​
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

All agencies have to interpret their enabling legislation to determine what they can legally do. If the legislation is clear and detailed, the agency's role will be easy to determine and there will be little controversy over the interpretation of the law

3 0
3 years ago
Im 13 should i have a phone
grin007 [14]
Um well it is 2020 im not surprised but uh sure?
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2.
Serga [27]
True because he’s given those rights as a state actor
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What key questions should be asked during an interview with an informant?
    6·1 answer
  • Prison reforms in the United States have taken place _____.
    7·1 answer
  • According to gottfredson and hirschi, self-control is a factor that:
    8·2 answers
  • Long-arm statutes: a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. b. have been ruled unconstitutional
    12·1 answer
  • What are the characteristics of the “Gold Standard” of behavioral science, the experimental model
    12·1 answer
  • Guilty or innocent? Please complete the argument, translate it into a logical expression, and prove it valid. If the suspect is
    5·2 answers
  • Law enforcement are members of a community that come together and enforce laws. not only they make sure that they keep people sa
    10·1 answer
  • 1. what is public opinion ?
    14·1 answer
  • When you drive in the city,there is a lot going on which of the following a driver's must do?
    14·2 answers
  • Congressional subpoena compliance and enforcement act
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!