Is that 2/3 of q or 2 over 3q?
for 2/3 of q. q=1/2 x 3/2 =3/4=0.75
for 2 over 3q q = 2 x 2/3= 4/3=1.3333
Answer:
a.4
Step-by-step explanation:
because
Answer:
<u>First question answer:</u> The limit is 69
<u>Second question answer:</u> The limit is 5
Step-by-step explanation:
For the first limit, plug in 
in the expression 
, that's the answer for linear equations and limits.
So we have:
The answer is 69
For the second limit, if we do same thing as the first, we will get division by 0. Also indeterminate form, 0 divided by 0. Thus we would think that the limit does not exist. But if we do some algebra, we can easily simplify it and thus plug in the value 
into the simplified expression to get the correct answer. Shown below:
<em>Now putting 1 in 
gives us the limit:</em>
So the answer is 5
Answer:Backward
Step-by-step explanation:
If the car next to Megan is being Pulled Forward and Megan is seeing only the pulled car then her car appears to be moving backward.
This can be said by using the concept of relative velocity which states that the speed of the body with respect to the other is considered to be at rest.
Here Megan's car appears to move backward with respect to the car next to her due to the existence of relative velocity.
Answer:
y=-2x-5
Step-by-step explanation:
y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-(-7)=-2(x-1)
y+7=-2x+2
y=-2x+2-7
y=-2x-5
