Answer:
Likely to spur economic growth;
a) Colonizers invest resources in transportation and infrastructure.
b) Colonizers establish a judiciary system.
Likely to hinder economic growth;
c) Colonizers extract natural resources
d) Colonizers do not settle within society's borders
Explanation:
The concept of economic growth is fundamental in capitalist economies. Productivity must grow as population grows and capital must grow to feed into increased productivity. Investment of capital leads to returns on investment (ROI) and increased capital accumulation.
Social inequality occurs when resources in a given society are distributed unevenly, typically through norms of allocation, that engender specific patterns along lines of socially defined categories of persons.
Results has shown that developing countries with high inequality tend to grow more slowly. Also some results show that developing countries with high inequality tend to grow more slowly.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
During the Ming and qing dynasty the Chinese government never encouraged technological innovation as a foundation of economic strength because of their ruling ideology they were unwilling to take any institution nor principles behind government in their idea of reform and as a result China never develop its own capability of technological reform which could have failed because of conservative forces ingrained in their culture
you actually don't <em>have </em>to pay for brainly! All questions can be asked and answered for free :)
Explanation:
The best way is to give the environment over entirely to the fossil-fuel industry to exploit for its “needs.” The horrific human arrogance that holds that our species has “dominion” over the Earth has produced the worst catastrophe in human history. So please, go ahead and continue to believe that “man” can and should “adapt the environment to his needs.” We are doomed now, since governments have been reluctant to act to reduce fossil-fuel use. WE are not - repeat: NOT - the only forms of life on the planet. Moreover, contrary to the wicked pronouncements of religions, especially Christianity, WE do not - repeat, NOT - have “dominion” over the Earth. Hope that answer is satisfactory for this question. If not, please go to the Internet and watch videos of California in flames, Bangladesh in strangling floods, and do read the last article of Bill McKibben, one of the great climate-change journalists in the world, and see that we are now going over the cliff, thanks to the monstrous Republican regime in the US, with the aid of other countries, to extinction. It is not so much that WE matter. There are many other species on Earth and human beings have succeeded now in wiping out 60 percent of them.
Corn belt
wheat belt
dairy belt
