In ancient times, scientists believed that matter could be destroyed by burning or breaking. Modern scientists believe that matt
er cannot be destroyed. What best accounts for these different opinions? A.scientists with varied backgrounds make different interpretations
B. scientists come up with different hypotheses without enough evidence
C.scientists believe in discarding all interpretations which were made in the past D.scientists propose different hypotheses to include all the scientific possibilities
Answer: A.scientists with varied backgrounds make different interpretations.
Explanation:
The scientists having knowledge of different aspects of scientific principles and skills can give different opinions to the situations. This is not necessary that the scientists working on modern technology will have the same opinion about the scientific research and innovations as that of the ancient scientists. Hence, they can make different opinions.
