Y-intercept:8x +9y=40
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
A)29 and B) 21,
Step-by-step explanation:
First,in the sequence , the parameter
must to be a integer.
Second, we need to solve the equations by .
All the option in the problem represent an
Then, we need to prove all number in the options, if the result is a integer number, this option can be part of the sequence.
For A)
For B)
For C)
For D)
Only A) and B) only A and B meet the requirement