Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
1) 110+30+a = 180
a = 180-140 = 40
Obtuse angled triangle
2) 50+50+C = 180
C=180-100 =80
Acute angled triangle
3) 45+45+b =180
b =180-90 = 90
Right angled triangle
4) 45+60+C = 180
C = 180-105 =75
Acute angled triangle
5) 94+47+b =180
b = 180-141=39
Obtuse angled triangle
6)81+53+a = 180
a =180-134 = 46
Acute angled triangle
7) 38+45+b =180
b = 180-83 =97
Obtuse angled triangle
8) 36+54+C =180
C =180-90 = 90
Right angled triangle.
D. -2p + q - 5 - you have to multiply, then distribute parentheses and apply plus or minus rules.
Answer:45 nickels
Step-by-step explanation:
If a nickel is $ 0.05 , than $ 2.25 divided by. $0.05 is 45.
