Answer:
c. 22.2%, 33.3%
Explanation:
Portfolio weight of each investment equals division of total value of each investment to total value of portfolio.
- Portfolio weight of YHOO = (300×$20)/(300*$20 +300× $30 + 80×150)= 0.222= 22%
- Portfolio weight of GM = (300×$30)/(300*$20 +300× $30 + 80×150)= 0.333= 33%
Funnel chart and donut chart can be used to display summary
values from two different levels of grouping in a report.
<span>There are many types of charts to show the data in
the form of bars, columns, lines, shapes, or other elements. Which chart is the
right one for your use, it depends on the type of data and how you want to
show. The different types of charts are: Bar Charts, Column Charts, Line Charts, Pie Charts, Donut Charts, Funnel Charts, Scatter Charts.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
<span>It definitely would be bad for most people. It would increase the price on a very common item that the majority of the population consumes and that would be harmful to the economy in an important aspect of the economy. It might also even limit the diversity of flavors and brand innovation.</span>
Answer:
the break even point in sales dollars is $223,667
Explanation:
The computation of the break even point in sales dollars is shown below:
= Fixed cost ÷ contribution margin ratio
= $80,520 ÷ ($138,960 ÷ $386,000)
= $80,520 ÷ 36%
= $223,667
Hence, the break even point in sales dollars is $223,667
