A comparison between two things<span> that does </span>use<span> "like" or "as" is a simile </span>
Answer: 13.87%
Explanation:
Effective interest rate is calculated by the formula:
= (1 + APR / Number of compounding periods)) ^ Number of compounding periods - 1
Number of compounding periods = 365 days in a year
= (1 + 0.1299/365) ³⁶⁵ - 1
= 0.138688
= 13.87%
Answer:
$11 billion annually.
Explanation:
Firms carried out assessments based on their daily activities as well as employee assessment.
Employees in firms are assessed based on their productivity level, rate at which they are absent from work as well as their turnover rate in the firm.
Low productivity can be defined as a decrease in the production capacity of a firm due to the inefficiency of workers.
Absenteeism can be defined as when a person is not present at work. This may be due to genuine or deliberate reasons.
Employee turnover can be defined as the number of employees who leave a firm and are replaced with new employees.
Low productivity, consistent absenteeism and employee turnover rates are said to cause firms to lose a lot of money due to:
a. Payment of salary for absent workers
b. Having to find replacement for absent staffs.
c. Low productivity due to lack of or absent staffs.
It is estimated that firms lose $11 billion annually in productivity, absenteeism, and employee turnover due to caring for aging parents.
According to my conclusion, Ling's can be blamed for carelessness. By definition, a tort of carelessness happens when somebody endures damage on account of another's inability to surrender over to a required obligation of care. In our case, by owning an open space, the administration is at risk to ensure that clients and workers have a protected domain. The supervisor realized that the water on the floor may be a potential safety risk and did not take any measures to caution the client. So, this way, the chief broke the obligation of care. Kim endured legitimately unmistakable damage (in the event that she got a specialist's note) caused by the director's carelessness.
Answer:
Paired Comparison
Explanation:
Paired Comparison is a type of job evaluation method in which individual jobs are evaluated in relation to every other job, based on a ranking system, and an overall score is given for each job, determining the highest-valued job to the lowest-valued job. Here in paired comparison method an employee's work is basically evaluated by looking to every job being performed in that organisation, then after doing the comparison the relative scores are assigned to the job which needs to be evaluated. This method is different to the methods which most organisation use where jobs are evaluated specifically on the basis of your skills, performance and your knowledge. One of the drawback which this method has is that the employees start comparing themselves with other employees, not their job but their personalities and knowledge etc. which in turn creates jealousy factor which in return can decrease the overall performance of organisation.
