1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TEA [102]
3 years ago
8

A child runs away from his house. What law is that?

Social Studies
1 answer:
nata0808 [166]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The youth in crisis law permits the Juvenile Court to assume jurisdiction over 16- and 17-year olds who are beyond their parents' control, run away from home, or are truant.

You might be interested in
What fractions with a numerator of 8 are equivalent to 2/3 and 4/6 ?
Alex

Answer:

8/12

Explanation:

Is your answer

8 0
3 years ago
How old was michael j fox when diagnosed with parkinson disease?
pochemuha
He was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease<span> 29 years old, in 1991.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What happened to Buddhism in India after 1100 C.E.?
larisa [96]
Buddhism continued to spread to other countries. Many Buddhism schools and places of worship were established. 
7 0
3 years ago
Developing Better Listening Skills
zlopas [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

1) Psychological barriers Is

We "tune out" others’ ideas that run counter to our own preconceived thoughts.

2) Physical Barriers

We find it difficult to listen because of impediments such as hearing loss, poor acoustics, or fatigue.

3) You can counter the effects of thought speed listening barriers by: controlling your surrounding.

4) You can improve your listening if you concentrate on what the speaker is saying.

5) From the scenario described

Thought speed

Nonverbal distractions

Faking attention

Are the notable listening barriers.

6) The things that will help the listener mentioned into the scenario to listen more effectively includes to:

Judge ideas, not appearances

Focus on nonverbal signals

Keep an open mind

Control his surroundings

5 0
3 years ago
Define the opening arguments and process of a Supreme Court case hearing
gogolik [260]

According to the Constitution, the SCOTUS has both appellate and original jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction means cases that are heard for the first time in the Supreme Court. These are usually high ranking cases that involve disputes between states or between high ranking officials.

Appellate cases make up the majority of cases heard by the SCOTUS. These are cases that have been heard before by lowers courts throughout the country. Unsatisfied parties with a lower court judgment submit a petition to the SCOTUS, called Writ of Certiorari. The SCOTUS then has all the files from the lower court case sent to it for examination. Four of the nine Justices must accept to hear a case for it to be heard by the SCOTUS. If the Justices accept the case, it is placed on the docket of cases to hear. The petitioner is granted a certain amount of time to write his brief on the case (no more than 50 pages). The opposite party, called the respondent, also has some time to submit its 50 pages brief.

After this initial process, both parties respond to each other’s brief with a shorter brief. The SCOTUS may also grant permissions to groups that are not directly involved in the legal dispute to provide their own file with recommendations and arguments in favor of the side they support. Such brief is called amicus curiae (friend of the Court, in Latin). The SCOTUS hears the oral arguments for both parties sometime between October and April. These proceedings are open to the public and usually start at 10am. Each hearing lasts an hour and each party has 30 minutes to present its argument. The hearing is interrogative (Justices ask questions to each party about their position). Petitioners speak first and respondents follow suit. If petitioners have saved time for a rebuttal, they will be the last to speak.

The Justices meet twice every week to review the cases and vote on a decision. This meeting is called the Justices’ Conference. After the result of the vote is available, any dissenting Justices may write a dissenting opinion on the final decision. If they vote ends up in a tie (because one of the Justices is unavailable), the lower court’s decision stands. In very rare occasions, a majority opinion may be changed if a Justice reverses his/her vote. It is only when opinions are disclosed in public open court hearings that they are official and final.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What inference can the reader make from the text of dylans letter dylans parents do not support his career goals?
    5·2 answers
  • Milk and dairy products are excellent sources for:
    10·2 answers
  • Summarize the judicial system
    11·2 answers
  • What caused groups of Africans in Southern Africa to migrate north? What was the effect of this?
    13·2 answers
  • While bowing to another person is a ritual among the Japanese, it is not expected for a Westerner to bow or to understand this r
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose members of the Republican Party prefer that a Republican be elected president in the next election, but they disagree ab
    12·1 answer
  • "All CA resident insurance licenses renew every _____ years on the last day of the month in which the license was originally iss
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of a plateau period?
    10·1 answer
  • Which factor helped Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire outlast the Roman Empire by nearly a thousand years?
    15·1 answer
  • Document A
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!