All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements reflect negative outcomes known to result from work teams? Check all that apply.

Business

1 answer:

finlep [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

B and D

Explanation:

When the CEO attends the team meeting our entire group defers to her opinion.

Her opinion might not be the correct decision to take on the issue, meaning the work team approach this matter as if their CEO is a dictator this can lead to wrong decisions taken and it can result to a negative outcome.

Every time we havd a meeting , it seems like new members join us and previous members drop out.

This shows the meeting is not specific in nature and thd team leader does not seem to have a grasp on the meetings this will lead to conflict as new menbers might not know previous agendas of the previous meetings

You might be interested in

Garden Corporation uses cost-plus pricing with a 30% mark-up. The company is currently selling 12,000 units at $21.45 per unit.

mel-nik [20]

Answer:

$23.44

Explanation:

The computation of profit charge per unit for earning same annual profit is shown below:

Given that

No of Units Sold = 12,000

Sale Price of each Unit = $21.45

Variable Cost = 11.50

So,

Contribution Per Unit is

= Selling price per unit - variable cost per unit

= $21.45 - $11.50

= $9.95

So,

Total Contribution is

= 12,000 units × $9.95

= $119,400

And,

Fixed Costs for the year is $60,000

So, the Profit for the year is

= Contribution margin - fixed cost

= $119,400 - $60,000

= $59,400

Now If the demand for the product falls to 10,000 Unit

So we assume Number of units expected to be sold is10,000

Since Variable cost Per Unit is 11.50

So, the Total Variable Cost is

= 10,000 units × $11.50

= $115,000

And,

Fixed Cost per annum $60,000

Expected Profit $59,400

So, the total amount is

= $115,000 + $60,000 + $59,400

= $234,400

So, the price per unit charged is

= $234,400 ÷ 10,000 units

= $23.44

3 0

3 years ago

Current expenditure is money spent on goods and services consumed within:

Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

A) one year

Explanation:

As the name implies, current expenditure is an accounting term used to classify the total cost incurred on an item presently (or currently) within one year.

For example, It would be out of place to classify the projected cost of renting a facility in the next three years as a current expenditure if payment would be made in the future.

5 0

3 years ago

During World War II, both Germany and England had plans for a paper weapon: they each printed the other's currency, with the int

Katarina [22]

Answer:

Relative prices would become more variable.

Menu and shoeleather costs would rise.

Hyperinflation could undermine the public's confidence in the economy.

Explanation:

The first reason that would make this to be effective is the hyperinflation that it will create and this is very bad for the economy as too much money will be chasing fewer goods.

Examples of what the effect of a paper money would be include: extreme hyperinflation can reduce the confidence of the public in the economy and economic policy; variability of the relative price between the countries will rise; shoeleather and menu costs will rise; it will result in an arbitrary change in tax liability; the level of uncertainty in the economy will rise and there will be an arbitrary wealth redistribution.

it should be noted this action would not deny the government seigniorage revenue from the inflation that would follow as the public will get the money dropped by the foreign airplanes.

3 0

3 years ago

The practice of having another company provide services is known as _____.

dedylja [7]

outsourcing. Hope that helps!!:) Brainliest??

8 0

3 years ago

In the RST partnership, Ron's capital is $80,000, Stella's is $75,000, and Tiffany's is $50,000. They share income in a 3:2:1 ra

Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

A. $74,000

Explanation:

Since in this question, Tiffany is retired so we have to find the new ratio which is shown below:

As Tiffany take the shares of both the partners in 3: 2

So, the new ratio would be

Ron share = (3 ÷ 5) × (1 ÷ 6) = 3 ÷ 30

Stella share = (2 ÷ 5) × (1 ÷ 6) = 2 ÷ 30

So the ratio would be 3: 2

The 1 ÷ 6 is the Tiffany ratio

Now the balance after Tiffany withdraws from the partnership equals to

= Paid amount by Tiffany - Tiffany capital

= $60,000 - $50,000

= $10,000

Ron's given amount = ($10,000 × 3 ÷ 5) = $6,000

So, Ron's capital balance equals to

= Ron's capital - Ron's given amount

= $80,000 - $6,000

= $74,000

6 0

3 years ago