I would say A because sometimes you need to cite different sources
Answer:
A,B,D,E
Explanation:
You could use an of these possbile answe choices. It is completely up to you. None of them are wrong but C doesnt sound very nice to me. It doesnt mark any of them wrong so feel free to click any of them or just one. Whatever suits you. HOPE THIS HELPS
Answer:
Explanation:
Well anorexic is not exactly an endearing quality. If Helen is svelte, she would hardly like to be called anorexic. The former means that she is exotic in a very attractive manner as well as being athletically thin. That's a real compliment. Anorexic is a disease caused by undereating.
He should be sensitive to how she things about language and how careful she is. D might be a factor.
She would hardly care how anorexic originated. It's not something she likely wants to be associated with.
If the word has a hidden meaning form denotation, then it is something to consider carefully. Skinny is an example. Scrawny is even worse. Helen would not like to be called either of those. They have a disagreeable meaning associated with them.
I'm not sure what the proper interpretation of thematic form of a word is. I know what a theme is, and it does not sound very romantic, unless he's going to go on forever about her thinness which is not very smart.
I would choose B. Don't use words that have hidden meanings or obvious connotations.
The divisions between poetry and prose aren't clear-cut, but here are some generally accepted differences. The language of prose is typically straightforward without much decoration. Ideas are contained in sentences that are arranged into paragraphs. There are no line breaks.
The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.
