Answer:
d) all of these: nominated by the president, confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and appointed for an indefinite period providing they maintain "good behavior."
Explanation:
Federal judges, who are the ones that are that preside over the Supreme Court proceedings and evaluate laws, are indeed nominated by the President, by the U.S. Senate, and appointed for an indefinite period providing they maintain "good behavior" or until they decide to retain, as Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution provides:
<em>he (The President) </em><em>shall nominate</em><em>, and by and </em><em>with the advice and consent of the Senate</em><em>, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, </em><em>judges</em><em> of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States.</em>
And as Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states:
<em>The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior</em>
With this latter provision, the Constitution guarantees that judges make decisions and evaluate statutes according to what is right under the law, and not according to popular's opinion or political pressure. This way, judges don’t have to fear that they will be fired if they make an unpopular decision.
Under the principles discussed in "A Sample Court Case," United States v. Jones, the court is most likely to rule that the officers' installation of the device was not a search because the officers did not obtain a warrant. Chris's argument was right; there should be a warrant presented for it to be considered as a lawful search.
<span>The misuse of group intelligence tests shortly after world WWI, specifically, group intelligence tests were inappropriately administered to people with lower intelligence or mentally disabled. The mentally disabled patients were called with derogatory terms or classifications that did not help the patients.</span>
