Explanation:
When the procedure is so standardized and outdated, now is the time for the HR-specalist to rethink the process seriously
- The present problem is clear that the procedure and the workforce are monotonous alike.
- In order to ensure that employees do not become homogenized, the organization must actively look out and hire from various backgrounds.
- Diversify the quest by reaching you where you are. Using professional associations for a number of applicants. Take part in networking groups, student associations and other networks now serving as a platform in the publications and engage in conventions or networking events with different candidates.
- Ask you to put out the names on the CVs to your recruitment service. Even the name will affect the best management efforts to ensure diversity.
- Start with the diversity the company is already seeking. Request endorsements from your manager. Different workers are linked to a number of job applicants. Have them involved.-Get everyone involved. Tell you to share your social media posts.
- The best policy is honesty. Answer me if you want a wider range of job candidates! This is the fastest and easiest way to speak. Just to say it takes the candidates ' guesswork. You know instantly that you respect various cultures, ages, races, etc.
A dynamic, inclusive business would definitely have a competitive advantage. A diverse group has various ideas, because no monotony offers it a snapshot of other people
Answer:
$10,340
Explanation:
The computation of k is shown below;
Rate per quarter = 6% ÷ 4 = 1.5%
In the case when perpetuity paid every year, the effective rate is
= (1 + 1.5%)^4 - 1
= 6.136%
Now Effective rate in the case when perpetuity paid every 5 years
= (1 + 1.5%)^(4 × 5) - 1
= 34.68%
Now
The present value of Both perpetuities = $6,500 ÷ 6.13635506249994% + $8,500 ÷ 34.6855006550052%
= $130,431.99
Now
annuity =k
Number of Periods=25
effective rate = 6.13635506249994%
Annuity k =PV ÷ ((1 - (1 + r)^-n) ÷ r
= $130,431.99 ÷ ((1-(1 + 6.13635506249994%)^-25) ÷ 6.13635506249994%
= $10,335.84
= $10,340
Answer: Conversion
Explanation:
Guilty of conversion is basically an unlawful act where an individual has exerted over another person's property without the consent of that person. Over here the broker has used funds to pay his office expenses. But that funds were not just his, it was of other people as well. Moreover, the funds he took out was more than the funds he actually contributed into the trust. Meaning he took portions of other people's funds as well as taking it without consent. Therefore, the broker is guilty of conversion.
Answer:
Ai tl câu hỏi này giùm e vớiqaj
Explanation:
