Answer:
In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning
Explanation:
Supreme Court: Traditional religious belief not necessary for conscientious objector status. ... The Court ruled 6-3 that his beliefs were sufficiently religious such that he was entitled to CO status. Justice Hugo L. Black authored an opinion for four justices interpreting the Selective Service Act.
Answer: I don't think I am seeing the full question but based on what I do see, I am assuming that the defendant's attorney could appeal the outcome, and if successful the case would be retried in a court of appeals.
Explanation: See above
