Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
Answer:
In a Direct Democracy, the power to govern the nation lies in the hands of the people instead of the elected representatives. Furthermore, in this particular form of democracy, political initiatives are taken directly by people.
Answer:
Habitability
Explanation:
When someone becomes a landlord, they are taking on a lot of responsibilities when it comes to the law. This is due to the fact that a tenant should be able to hold a landlord accountable. One of the most important duties that a tenant needs to fulfill is that of providing a livable, safe, clean place to live. This is called "warranty of habitability." This includes the public areas of the building a tenant is renting. In this case, Chester's landlord is breaching Chester's right to habitability by not ensuring that the place is clean and safe to live in.
