Answer:Churning
Explanation: My teacher told us in class
A legal description would provide the least ambiguous description of a property, for purposes of a deed.
A legal description is the geographical description of real estate that identifies its precise place, barriers, and any easements for the motive of a legal transaction, such as a transfer of possession. A criminal description is saved with the deed and filed with the county clerk or county tax assessor.
There are 3 types of legal descriptions of belongings typically used: metes and limits, government survey, and lot and block.
An avenue to cope with is not a legal description. road addresses regularly alternate, and that they had been never intended to offer a reliable description for purposes of deed education. An avenue to deal with isn't always sufficient to serve as a good enough criminal description of the actual estate.
Learn more about A legal description here
brainly.com/question/14414648
#SPJ4
Answer:
3,000 $100 bills equivalent to $300,000
Explanation:
The economic order quantity (EOQ) is the optimum quantity of a good to be purchased or required at a time in order to minimize ordering and carrying costs in inventory.
EOQ = the square root of [(2 times the annual demand in units times the incremental cost to process an order) divided by (the incremental annual cost to carry one unit in inventory)]
- annual demand in units = 12,500 x 12 = 150,000
- incremental costs to process an order = $300
- incremental annual cost to carry one unit in inventory = 10% x 100 = $10
EOQ = √[(2 x 150,000 x $300) / $10] = √($90,000,000 / $10) = √9,000,000 = 3,000 bills
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
Crash worthiness
Explanation:
Crash worthiness is a term that depicts a vehicle's capacity to ensure its tenants during an impact.
In the event that you continue wounds in a fender bender because of the vehicle's absence of crash value, at that point you may have a case against the vehicle's producer.
It is exceptionally reliant on how the materials, development and plan of the vehicle cooperate.
