All categories

3 years ago

MORE MATH GENIUSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Oliga [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The friend caught the ball at 2 feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. False; the ball was not still in the air at 1 second the x-component of the vertex is 0.5.

2. False; the x-component of the vertex is 0.5

3. True; the ball was tossed at a height of 2 feet (when x=0, y=2), it is safe to assume the ball was caught at the same height.

4. False; when x = 0, y = 2.

You might be interested in

Please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!

aivan3 [116]

Answers:

Step-by-step explanation:

We must simplify each option to see if they are equivalent to $-\frac{3}{8}$ .

Lets try A.

$-\frac{6}{16}$ can be simplified to $-\frac{3}{8}$ by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 3.

$-\frac{6}{16}$ ÷ $\frac{3}{3} = -\frac{3}{8}$

A is correct!

Lets try B

$\frac{12}{32}$ simplifies to $\frac{3}{8}$ . However, because this answer is not negative, it is not equivalent.

Lets try C

There is a negative in the numerator, making this fraction negative. So yes, $\frac{-3}{8} = -\frac{3}{8}$ .

Bonus Info: If there was a negative in both the numerator and denominator, the two negatives would cancel eachother out, making the fraction positive

C is correct!

Lastly, Lets try D

There is a negative in the denominator, so this fraction is negative. $\frac{9}{-24}$ can be simplified by dividing by 3 to $-\frac{3}{8}$ .

$\frac{9}{-24}$ ÷3 = $-\frac{3}{8}$

D is correct!

Hope this helped you!~

6 0

3 years ago

The length of a rectangle is 2 ft longer than its width.

notsponge [240]

If the length is 2ft longer than it’s width
Let’s assume width as X and so the length will be X+2
Perimeter=40ft
Putting the values into a equation, we get,
X+2+X=40
=2X+2=40
=2X=38
=X=19
Therefore
Length =X+2=19+2
=21ft
Width=X=19ft
Area of rectangle =lxb
= 21x19
3992ft
HOPE IT WAS HELPFUL :)

6 0

3 years ago

Please help thank you and show all work.

Daniel [21]

Question 1:

Look at the first attached image.

We want to solve for the height of the smaller building. Let's start by making a right triangle with angle of 15 degrees and adjacent side of 51 m.

Let's solve for the other leg. Multiply the tangent with 51 m to get the length of the other leg.

$51*tan(15)$
$\approx 14$

Now, subtract that from 207 to get the height of the smaller building.

$207-14=193$

That's your answer.

Question 2:

The angle of elevation is congruent to the angle of depression because they are alternate interior angles.

Thus, you can choose the 1st and 4th choices as your answer.

Question 3:

Look at the second attached image.

Angle E is congruent to angle D for the same reasons mentioned in the last question.
We can create an equation.

$3x+1=2(x+8)$

Distributive property

$3x+1=2x+16$

Subtract both sides by 1 and 2x

$x=15$

Since E and D are congruent, just plug this value into one of the equations for E or D. You get 46.

The third choice is your answer. Hope this helps! :)