The commander-in-chief role addresses major problems, while the chief of state role is mostly symbolic.
There were actually four HUGE causes for WW1, treaties and alliances brought many countries into war, the imperialism of some countries scared other countries, and they were "defending" themselves, there was a lot of weapons stocking, and countries were creating gigantic armies, and that threatened other countries, and then we have plain old nationalism.
Political Science | it’s a common term and I believe it’s the only term but someone more knowledgeable can correct me if I’m wrong
Answer:
<em>Lenin, Stalin and the Bolsheviks used ruthless methods to surprises political rivals with tight centralization and secret police to enforce power with terror. ... in the </em><u><em>1930s,</em></u><em> in which millions of innocent people perished, had no rationale beyond ... Stalin had subjected all aspects of Soviet society to strict party-state control, not ...
</em>
<em>Missing: </em><u><em>tzar </em></u><em>| Must include: </em><u><em>tzar</em></u>
Explanation:
