So in the case of emmet till, he was just a 14 year old african american who was "accused" of "flirting" with a white women. Was is the true? probly not. BUT he was still kidnapped by a group of white man and was lynched. Btw lynched is a illegal public execution( google it, no words can describe how awful it is) He was given NO TRIAL or ANYTHING. It was murder and a HUGE unjustice to a kid.
In Tom's case, he is accused of rape of a white women (It wasnt rape, she came on top of him, but was ashamed so she didnt admit it) He was given a trial, but no real chance(It didnt matter if he was able to go to court, the verdict would say he is guilty NO MATTER the evidence, because he is black)
Tom was sentenced to death but killed for "attempting to escape" and shot 17!! times (over-kill)
in Both cases, they didnt stand a chance because of the prejudice. No matter what, they would have been found guilty(even if they did not do anything at all) because their skin.
b is correct answer it is wright
You must turn them to sentence
Two boys...very naughty....always playing by the road...their parents said its dangerous to play at road.....one of them not listening...second boy listening and safe.....the next boy still played at the road....a car nearly hit him.....he understood why we shouldnot play at road...The end
Answer:
The option which best summarizes the central idea of the excerpt is:
Non standard forms of English are valid
Explanation:
This is an excerpt from Mother Tongue.
Mother tongue is the very first language or the native language of an individual that he or she learns from childhood.
The central idea of the excerpt suggests that no matter how different a person’s English Language sounds, it still remains valid and that all forms of English Language are meaningful.
Here, the speaker speaks up about her mother’s English Language to support the idea that it is her truest form of expression, and that it was the language that first made sense to her and helped her interpret the world.
