The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4
Answer:
Return on Investment = 17%
Explanation:
Return on Investment = Net income from investment / Investment opportunity * 100
Where Net income from investment = (Sales * Contribution margin ratio) - Fixed expenses
Net income = ($1,530,000 * 30%) - $306,000
Net income = $459,000 - $306,000
Net income = $153,000
Return on Investment = $153,000 / $900,000 * 100
Return on Investment = 17%
Answer:
(c) MUa/Pa = MUb/Pb
Explanation:
The Utility Maximization Rule is
MUa/Pa = MUb/Pb, where MUa represents the marginal utility derived from good a, Pa represents the price of good a, MUb represents the marginal utility of good b and Pb represents the price of good b.
Answer:
9.8043608091773
Explanation:
hope it help...... mark me brainliest!?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question we can say that Yes, the dealership is contractually bound to sell Mike the car at that price. This is assuming that the ad handed to the dealership by Mike is an actual ad that was designed and published by the dealership. If this is the case the dealership must uphold their price or it will be considered false advertisement and Mike would have a basis on which to sue the business.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
