<span>This meant a great deal to people whose hopes were on change and good governance as they saw this as a way forwards towards making the country a better one through right governance and policy making in America most especially this was seen as a unifying force that place the love for the country utmost . In some parts of the world such as Europe this was seen as an end to imperial rulership</span>
Answer:
I think Spain best illustrates the statement "contact with Europeans dramatically alters American Indian societies, both culturally and economically."
Explanation:
Plains Native Americans(American Indians) lived in a variety of sedentary and nomadic communities before the invasion of Spanish colonizers.
They farmed corn, hunted, and
often gathered, establishing different lifestyles and eating healthy diets but with the arrival of horses on the Plains along with the Spanish colonizers, they disrupted their agricultural norms and intensified hunting competition between American Indian groups.
The Spanish altered American Indian lives in many ways. Their intrusion resulted in changing the tribal customs and religious traditions of the American Indian community. Tribal alliances changed positions and new rivalries were developed. American Indians lost their land, their families, and their way of life.
The Indians were then compelled to feed the invaders with food initially used to feed themselves. This furthers proved to be a burden during the dry growing seasons. Implementing the encomienda and repartimiento systems which forced Indians to pay taxes with their food, blankets, and their labor. Repartimiento was a disadvantage to the Indians because it took from them their own fields to plant and harvest instead forced them to plant and harvest on the Spanish fields thereby altering their economy as a people
After following the instructions, these are my comments.
I doodle for a minute without thinking, following my instincts and feeling free to draw in any direction. Then I draw a square at the back of the paper
1. I compare the two activities in that they allow me to simply express my creativity by following my instinct.
2. What I felt when I was doodling and drawing figures was the following.
- It made me express myself like never before.
- I was not restricted to following strict instructions.
- I felt very creative to just draw what I wanted.
3. Between the two activities, what I think needs certain control or discipline:
- is when you have to heed instructions in order to get to a determined result.
Otherwise, it is very important to be free to be creative
I conclude that true expression comes from creativity, not from a set of instructions or restrictions.
Freely expressing yourself is a true mark of creativity.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/4121462?referrer=searchResults
35 Words a president has to take.
