1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew11 [14]
3 years ago
9

Based on the epigraph and the video, why would anyone from the New

History
1 answer:
Y_Kistochka [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I am not sure about this question sry but u can try asking a tutor u don't need to use any points

You might be interested in
Why did the British and the Natives not share the land?
irga5000 [103]

Answer:

Hiya there!

Explanation:

Indians were being forced from their land because the United States believed that the Indians right to the land was insubordinate to their own. Also since the U.S.'s force was superior to that of the Native Americans they could out gun them and take the land without much struggle.

Hope this <em><u>Helped!</u></em> :D

Credit sourced from "sites.google.com"

7 0
4 years ago
How do constitutional rights impact individual citizens?
suter [353]

Answer:

Explanation:

Constitutional rights gives us the rights for our voices to be heard, but regardless of what rights we have , we  will not be heard until violent/ non violent actions occur.(riots,protests,etc.

3 0
3 years ago
Describe the major characteristics of manorialism and feudalism
Svet_ta [14]
Manorialism is a system of vesting property in a lord of the manor, who had jurisdiction over subject peasants. The system was based on mutual obligation and benefit. The king or some other high lord gave the use and benefit of the manor to the lord of the manor in exchange for military and political support. The lord of the manor gave the peasants a place to live, fields to farm, and protection in exchange for labor, part of the crop, or other economic support.
4 0
4 years ago
Who was to blame for the death of reconstruction?
rosijanka [135]
Both but more to the South. 

How the North killed the reconstruction.
- The North gave up on the South
- The North stopped trying
- They become too involved with their own problems

How the South killed the reconstruction.
- The South rebelled against the North
- The South refused to accept any changes made.
- Any steps are taken to move forward with reconstruction the South would be rejected.

The South is more to blame.
-No matter what the North tried, the South would refuse to make any changes.-They killed many innocent lives.-They put in more effort in fighting and resisting reconstruction.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following Native American tribes helped the pilgrims to survive in the New World? a. Apache c. Sioux b. Wampanoags
barxatty [35]
It was the Wampanoags or B.
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the benefits and drawbacks of having a railroad run through your city in the 1800s?
    11·2 answers
  • All of the following are examples of long-term impacts of the Mongolian invasions except: Group of answer choices
    7·1 answer
  • Did Egyptians choose to live next to a desert because they loved the heat.
    9·2 answers
  • Explain the impact of the westward movement on the lives of Native Americans.
    13·1 answer
  • Which change was needed for African American men throughout the United States to be able to vote in Congressional elections?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me ASAP
    11·1 answer
  • How does the fourth amendment attempt to protect Americans privacy
    11·2 answers
  • What is the era when the native Americans made contact with Europe
    10·1 answer
  • What was Africa before colonization?
    5·1 answer
  • The Voting Rights Act ended poll taxes. literacy tests. voter segregation. gender discrimination
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!