So you know he starts off with 19. This is the first term. He learns one more each week, so let’s assign this the variable w.
19+1w
Set this equal to 47, since you’re solving how many to get to 47 recipes.
19+1w=47
To find out how many weeks, isolate the variable. Begin by combining like terms. Move the 19 to the side of the 47 by subtracting.
19+1w=47
-19 -19
—————-
1w= 28
To further isolate w, divide both sides by 1. This removes the coefficient from w and isolates it.
1w=28
—- ——
1 1
w=28
This means it will take him 28 weeks to learn 47 appetizer recipes in total. To check this answer, simply plug it back into the original equation.
19+1(28)=47
19+28=47
47=47
This means the answer is right, it will take 28 weeks.
I hope this helps! Please comment if you need any more explanation and I’ll get back to you ASAP.
In this case u need to divide 10 1/2 by 14 coz theres 14 ones in 14
so 10 1/2 divided by 14 = 0.75
<em>so theres 0.75 sugar in one ounce of drink ;)</em>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A commission of $48 was earned on the sale of a camera. If a 30% commission rate is given, what was the price of the camera sold
A camera was on sale for 30% off, and the discount was $48. What was the original price of the camera
The markup on a camera was $48 at a rate of 30%. What was the wholesale price of the camera
Answer:
Total number of dimes collected = 50
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of dimes collected = d
And the number of nickels collected = n
On day collection in nickels and dimes = $6.55
Since, 1 nickel = $0.05
Therefore, 'n' nickels = 0.05n
And 1 dimes = $0.10
Value of 'd' dimes = $0.10d
Total value of 'n' nickels and 'd' dimes = $(0.05n + 0.10d)
So the equation for the total value will be,
0.05n + 0.10d = 6.55
5n + 10d = 655 --------(1)
Number of nickels was 6 more than half the number of dimes.
n =
+ 6 ------(2)
By substituting the value 'n' from equation (2) to equation (1)
5(
+ 6) + 10d = 655
+ 30 + 10d = 655
= 655 - 30
25d = 625 × 2
d = 
d = 50
Therefore, total number of dimes collected = 50
Answers:
<h2>17. B</h2><h2>18. B</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
17. We need to understand what an indirect proof is. In an indirect proof, you prove a statement by showing that the negation of the statement is false.
The "then" part of the conditional is the "to prove" statement.
In an indirect proof, we assume the opposite of what we want to prove, this is also called proof by contradiction.
So if we need to prove angle A is not an obtuse angle, we will assume it is and then use the proof format to show that angle A cannot be obtuse.
<h2>The answer is B: Assume angle A is an obtuse angle</h2>
18. This question is asking us to use an indirect proof again. The "then" part of the statement is "KL > JK" and is the "to prove" statement.
We need the opposite of this, which would be assuming that KL <u><</u> JK.
<h2>The answer is B: Assume that KL <u><</u> JK</h2><h2>I'm always happy to help :)</h2>