Answer E: undermine the traditional basis of a claim about conventional medicine’s legitimacy
Explanation:
Correct. The author discusses Eddy’s study in the context of elaborating on the question she asked in the fourth paragraph, “But how scientific is conventional ‘scientific’ medicine anyway?” This question challenges the perspective on conventional medicine described in the first paragraph, which sees conventional medicine as “scientific” and alternative medicine as “pseudoscience.” Since Eddy’s study concluded that conventional medical decision making was not based on strong scientific evidence, it provides evidence that refutes the traditional argument for the legitimacy of conventional medicine.
Answer: He conveys that many different arguments can be presented against socialism.
Explanation: The rest don’t make sense, there is no process nor is it in order of importance. The next option says each point is a logical result of the previous one but each of the arguments don’t seem to connect to the previous.