I think the answer is true, but I'm not really sure
T made political and economic sense for some to do so.
Explanation:
First off, not all Native Americans supported the French during the colonial wars. Most Algonquian speakers supported the French and most Iroquois supported the English. In general, the key concepts here are economic power and political power.
The fur trade dominated colonial relations from the Ohio Valley and the Upper Midwest. Whoever controlled the economy of that area would have both economic and political power. The Iroquois were positioned to control trade via the Great Lakes. Algonquian speakers were able to go around them and deal directly with Europeans. Iroquois leaders attempted to push into the interior using British guns while Algonquians pushed the Lakota out of Minnesota and onto the plains.
Many Algonquians intermarried with the French and created a new ethnic group, the Metis who also aligned with the French, in part, because both were Catholic.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
<u>There is no setting that is always absolutely preferable for the praise of the performance. The setting which you chose to praise the performance of the person depends more on you, the policy, the situation and the purpose. </u>
Sometimes, you are in need of quick or long-distance praise, so you should write the message.
Another time, a person did a great teamwork job or has to lead the team well, so you will want to praise them in public and in the presence of the team.
If you are giving long, detailed feedback on the performance, you will want to praise them in person and to make it the center of the conversation and as personal as possible.
D, Racial desegregation, this started becoming a movement in the 1950's and lasted through the 70's
