Answer: 1. a. The existence of a no-fault law.
2. d. $17,000
Explanation:
1. For Jane to prove that Famous was indeed negligent, she definitely does not need the No - Fault law. This is a law that is mostly applicable to motor vehicle accidents and means that the individual parties are responsible for whatever injuries they sustain and the person who actually caused the accident is irrelevant. The main aim of this is to reduce the damages claims that one can be put on Insurance which increase insurance premiums.
<em>If this law was to be applied here, Jane would</em> <em>be responsible for her own injuries and her suit would fail. </em>
2. Jane missed 2 weeks of work and in each week she earns $5,000.
She also had medical expenses of $4,000 and estimated pain and suffering of $3,000.
The general damages therefore are the two weeks she missed plus the medical expenses and the pain and suffering.
= 5,000 ( 2) + 4,000 + 3,000
= 10,000 + 7,000
= $17,000
Over the next few years, many organizations will be collecting <u>vast </u>amounts of data on their employees ranging from engagement to well-being.
<h3>How is Big Data Collected?</h3>
Much of the big data that employees, persons, organizations generate come from three major sources:
- Machine Data
- Transactional Data
- Social Data
Data collection and analysis provide insights that are useful for strategic decision-making. This is why organizations are looking to collect and analyze them.
See the link below for more about Big Data:
brainly.com/question/24916490
Lay people off or they would have to take people's money from the bank and pay them back later but I don't know the term that it is called when they do that
Answer:
Paul Copan
Explanation:
Dr. Robertson McQuilkin can be considered a very biblical man, and as such, would always favor socialism more than free market capitalism. His phrase "Capitalism is for freedom, socialism is for equality" and the fact that he believed in a strict following of the Bible, you make him a more socialist person.
Dr. Paul Copan is also a very religious man, but his views are less extreme than Dr. McQuilkin's. He is more pragmatic and argues in favor of religion from a more neutral or agnostic point of view. He even argues that religious beliefs and economics are not mutually exclusive.
Answer: Attitude inoculation
Explanation:
Attitude inoculation is referred to as the technique or method which is used in order to make an individual immune to the attempts taken in order to change the attitude thereby firstly exposing themselves to the small arguments taken against their position. It is referred to as so since it tends to works similarly like a medical inoculation, that exposes an individual's body to the weaker state of the virus.