Answer:
(1) understated
(2) understaded
(3) unchanged
Explanation:
The amount of equivalent units will be higher as the ending inventory of work in process will be above of what it should be.
As we have more equivalent untis the cost per equivalent unit will be lower:
So both, conversion cost and total cost per equivalent untis will e lower than it should be as are getting divided over a larger amount.
the physical amount of units worked during the month and those which are complete will not be affected as the percentage of completion is an accounting tool to calculate the cost not to count the amount of units in possession
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
company B's cost of equity is 14.0375% - 8.975% = 5.0625% higher than company A's cost of equity
Explanation:
cost of equity = risk free rate + (beta x market premium)
risk free rate = 4.25%
market premium = market return - risk free rate = 11% - 4.25% = 6.75%
Company A's cost of equity = 4.25% + (0.7 x 6.75%) = 8.975%
Company B's cost of equity = 4.25% x (1.45 x 6.75%) = 14.0375%
this means that company B's cost of equity is 14.0375% - 8.975% = 5.0625% higher than company A's cost of equity.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Positive confirmations.
Explanation:
Positive confirmations are audit procedures by which ambiguous information is clarified. It also implies the confirmation of the accuracy of the data provided in the company's books and Financial Statements. By doing so, liabilities, bank accounts, accounts receivables and payables amounts are verified.
The answer is Target-driven<span>
</span>
