1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
3 years ago
12

After Benjamin Franklin proposed the idea of France aiding the US, it took France's King Louis XVI only ____ ____ to agree.

History
1 answer:
Veseljchak [2.6K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Four days

Explanation:

After Benjamin Franklin proposed the idea of France aiding the US, it took France's King Louis XVI only FOUR DAYS to agree.

During the American war of independence against the British, the Americans at the time seek for help from the French leader which was approved by the French leader sending approximately 12,000 soldiers and 32,000 sailors to support the American war effort against the British.

Hence, the answer, in this case, is FOUR DAYS.

According to historical records, it was revealed that France under King Louis XVI decided to support the Americans after Four days when Benjamin Franklin when they requested assistance.

You might be interested in
Which section of Texas is known for its many lakes, reservoirs, and hills?
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

A. Llano Basin

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are interest rates?
Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Think of it, when you buy a loan, you have a interest rate. You have to pay off the interest rate with the loan. Hope this helps.

6 0
3 years ago
What problem is the cartoon meant to highlight? the monopolies created by large corporations the corruption of government by mon
storchak [24]

Hey just to let you know we would need the cartoon in order to answer correctly or it makes no sense okay?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did ideas spread in early china?
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:trading routes called silk road

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Once the delegates determined the Three-Fifths Compromise, what issue did they tackle next? the New Jersey Plan the Virginia Pla
    12·1 answer
  • How did the abbasids make sure they held onto power
    12·1 answer
  • if more people try to buy a product because the price has been reduced which most accuretly describes what has been increased?
    10·1 answer
  • One reason that people are hesitant to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is _____.
    7·2 answers
  • What was this structure most likely used for?
    14·2 answers
  • Which answer best details one advantage held by the Confederate States in the Civil War? (1 point) The Confederate States had mo
    11·2 answers
  • Herbert Hoover was the attorney general war president for Calvin Coolidge True or False
    5·2 answers
  • Here is a question that very few people should get
    13·1 answer
  • How do you think food allocation may have contributed to World War II?
    12·1 answer
  • After a volcano erupts, ash will fill the air and block sunlight for a period of time. Which of the following could result from
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!