Answer:
The options for this question are:
1. A negligent tort because Matt was careless in throwing the rock.
2. A negligent tort because he only intended to harm Jamal.
3. An accidental tort because he struck Sally by mistake.
4. An intentional tort because Matt intended to throw the rock and physical injury resulted.
5. Matt did not commit a tort against Sally because he only intended to strike Jamal with the rock
The best answer choice is:
An intentional tort because Matt intended to throw the rock and physical injury resulted.
Explanation:
If Matt originally wanted to hit Jamal with a rock in the head but instead hit Sally who is standing directly next to Jamal, then he committed an intentional tort. This kind of tort can be transferred as the tort easer knew certainly that his plan would result in inevitable consequences.<span>
</span>
P = mv
p = 3.5 × 5
p = 17.5 kg .m/s
I hopes this helps
Answer:
I believe it would be C.
Explanation:
The change in the direction is the key factor to look at to find the answer
.......................................................................................................
