is a classic approximation, true for small x.
The next term in the polynomial expansion will be 
where k is a positive number. So our estimate 1-x is definitely an underestimate on both sides of x=0.
Since for negative xs the exponential rises exponentially and the line only linearly, the exponential exceeds the line for all negative x. For positive x, the line quickly goes negative while the exponential is always positive.
So, there's no interval for which our approximation is an overestimate.
Answer:
A. the y-intercept of the graph is 900, and as X increases, f(x) approaches 100.
Step-by-step explanation:
The table can be described by the function ...
f(x) = 100 +800·2^-x
This is an exponential decay (not a constant-rate decay) from a y-intercept of 900 down to a minimum value of 100 (not zero).
The best description is that of choice A.
Answer: 25
Step-by-step explanation: Your welcome
Answer:
d= +3
Step-by-step explanation:
1st term = -19
2nd term = -16
d = 2nd - 1st
d= -16-(-19)
d = +3
