It's not rigid because dilations (scale factor not equal to 1) change the length of the segments, or the distances between the points. You'll get a similar figure but it won't be congruent. For example, if the scale factor is 3, then the distances will be three times as large; or the lengths will be 3 times as long.
To be "rigid", the lengths must be kept the same. In contrast, a reflection is rigid because the distances are kept the same. The only thing changing is the orientation (clockwise to counter-clockwise, or vice versa).
The quotient would be 192
The formula for the number of combinations when choosing "r" objects (or people) from a larger set of "n" objects (or people) is:
combinations = n! / [r! * (n-r)!]
combinations = 34! / [6! * 28!]
combinations = 34*33*32*31*30*29*28! / [6! * 28!]
combinations = 34*33*32*31*30*29 / 6*5*4*3*2
combinations = 34*33*32*31*29 / 4*3*2
combinations = 34*11*4*31*29
combinations = 1,344,904
Source:
http://www.1728.org/combinat.htm
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
2x - 3 > 11 - 5x
+5x +5x
7x - 3 > 11
+3 +3
7x > 14
x > 14/7
x = 2
