Imperialism and industrialization both made countries more powerful in terms of their economies and world power
Feeble=9
Dehumanizing=10
Overseer=2
Sloop=3
Reverberate=5
Plantation=1
Incoherent=6
Rapturous=7
Ineffable=8
Privation=4
Please let me be notified if there are any errors please.
Hello there! I think I have a good explanation to answer your inquiry:
Basically, Bauby is bitter over his physical condition and the fact that he's drooling trapped inside a mental hospital. The patient's sense of wit and mind are going strong, but his physical condition is a repulsively frail annoyance.
Before his illness, Bauby was priviliged and successful; he had tidy fabrics, ate fine dinners, and presumably slept with little worries on his conscience. More relatedly, the now-ill big shot wore cashmere and draped blankets made of the same material on his furniture. Cashmere, to him, symbolizes the wealthy life and proud identity that he longs to have again, but can't because of his sickness.
The answer is D. through Toby’s physical appearance.
Answer:
A) Fear appeals to the desire to be safe. To clarify, appeal to fear means presenting alternatives, one of which causes fear in order to force the person to choose what you would like them to choose.
B) False Dichotomy gives two choices, one of which is not truly an option. In false dichotomy, the alternatives do not exclude each other. They overlap, which means the person isn't really presented with a real opportunity to choose.
C) Slippery slope claims that one action leads to a series of undesirable events. This fallacy suggests that an insignificant first event might lead to another event, that might lead to yet another one and so on until, ultimately, a grand or disastrous event would happen in consequence of that first, small one.
D) Popularity claims something is true because most people agree. This fallacy basically states that, if everyone is doing it, then it's because it is the right thing to be done.
E) Post Hoc incorrectly assumes that one event causes another. This fallacy assumes that temporal succession establishes a connection between events. That is, if this event came after that one, it must be its consequence.
