Answer: P=8
Step-by-step explanation:
3p-5=19
U turn -5 to +5
Then u add 5 to both sides, -5 and 19
3p-5=19
+5=+5
-5 and +5 cancel each other out so know it’s
3p=24
Because 19 plus 5 is 24
Now u have to get the variable by itself by dividing 3 on both sides of the equal sign 3p and 24
3 and 3 cancel each other out so now you only have p=24 but then 24 divided 3 is 8
Answer:
A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.
B. Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
C.
D.
E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis
F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=362 represent the random sample taken
X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate
estimated proportion of orders not accurate
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.
B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.
C: Find the test statistic
Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:
D: Find the critical value(s)
Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:
P value
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:
E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.
Fail to the reject the null hypothesis
F: Write the conclusion of the test.
So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.