The agreement about the way to represent enslaved people is the Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787. It was stated in the Constitutional Convention that slaves should be counted as three-fifths of a person, the clause intent to balance the power and influence that the counting of slaves in the Southern could have in elections.
The representatives were defined by the number of population and Southern had many slaves and wanted all of them to be counted as voters but they were still treated as property and were not taxed as free people, because the number of slaves was much bigger in southern than northern states, that already abolished slaving, the northern fought back for a fairly counting for the representatives, so they came to an agreement to count three slaves out of every five slaves regarding the population of each state and for taxation matters.
Both objectivists and cultural relativists agree that: c. moral judgments do not differ from culture to culture.
<h3>Who are Objectivists and Cultural Relativists?</h3>
While moral objectivists believe that moral standards of living have no connection to human inventions, Cultural relativists believe that moral standards are intertwined with human inventions.
The two theories agree that moral judgments do not vary by culture. Therefore option C is right.
Learn more about objectivists here:
brainly.com/question/11328803
Manners are a kind of behaviour that is directed at other people: good manners (for example: greeting people) are needed to be able to have a good relationship with others, to be seen as polite and cooperative.
The correct answer is: social behaviour (a)
According to the Graph, your answer is A. Thanks for using Brainly!
B my friend because most African Americans fought for civil rights such as to vote and also to stop segregation
