A. Because that is a “threat” and a crime deterrence is a specific act of a punishment to someone
i'm not to sure about these ones because when i looked them up they weren't making sense but i think 12 is F, 13 is E, 14 is C, 15 is D, 16 is A, 17 is B- hopefully this helps, if not my apologies
Answer:
b. have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them
Explanation:
In business law, one of the main grounds of rescission are: misrepresentation (whether fraudulent, negligent or innocent), non-disclosure in relation to contracts of insurance, and
undue influence, duress and unconscionability.
In this case, RaeAnn and Rick have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them
Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
Option A
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
The Supreme Court of America has made and landmark judgements in electronic surveillance like tapping phone calls and accessing the phone records.
It stated that without a proper warrant if the police department carry out electronic surveillance means it amounts to be illegal, it is a breach of privacy of individuals.
So, the top court has issued guidelines before proceeding with the electronic surveillance. This judgement of preserving the right of the individual is considered to be the major policy decision taken by the court.
The answer is true. Sorry this is probably late lol.