i think your answer is B
ok
:P
╦___________________________________╦
│Hope this helped _____________________│
│~Xxxtentaction ^̮^ _____________________│
╩___________________________________╩
Answer:
You get the highest net income in year 2 with <u>Units-of-production method.</u>
Explanation:
Schedule of depreciation expense, accumulated depreciation, and book value per year for the equipment under the three depreciation methods is attached.
<u>Straight-line
</u>
Depreciation expense 2nd year=$5.000=(Original Value -Residual Value)/Useful life
<u>Units-of-production
</u>
Units of Production Rate=2.5=(Original Value -Residual Value)/estimated productive life
Depreciation expense 2nd year= 7250
<u>
Double-declining-balance.
</u>
Depreciation rate 20,00% 1/useful life *100
Depreciation expense 2nd year= 6720
Pn = P0(1+r)∧n
Pnis future value of P0
P0 is original amount invested
r is the rate of interest
n is the number of compounding periods (years, months, etc.)
P(n) = 2250(1+(.03/4)∧8
** since the interest is compounding quarterly, you need to divide the rate by 4, the number of quarters in a year.
Then you would do the math.
Answer:
B. Creating value for customers.
Explanation:
Marketing is all about building values for customers. Its about creating customer relationships which are profit generating. Any company or brand has a value proposition. It is the set of benefits the company promises to deliver to the consumer to satisfy his/her needs. Thus marketing is the bridge which connects the brand with the customers perceived value of the brand. It makes sure the customer pledges loyalty to the brand, by delivering on its promises on the value proposition. Thus, the most important role that marketing plays in the economy is Creating Value for Customers.
The answer is "<u>The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to differences in scientific judgments."</u>
It isn't surprising that as the inquiry proceeds with, researchers at times differ about the bearing in which truth lies. Economists regularly differ for a similar reason. Economics is a youthful science, and there is still much to be educated. Economists here and there differ in light of the fact that they have distinctive hunches about the legitimacy of elective hypotheses or about the extent of critical parameters that measure how monetary factors are connected.
