Answer:
isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
denote a set of elements.
would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of
.
For example, with
,
and
are both members of
. However,
because the pairs are ordered.
A relation
on
is a subset of
. For any two elements
,
if and only if the ordered pair
is in
.
A relation
on set
is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:
- Reflexivity: for any
, the relation
needs to ensure that
(that is:
.)
- Symmetry: for any
,
if and only if
. In other words, either both
and
are in
, or neither is in
.
- Transitivity: for any
, if
and
, then
. In other words, if
and
are both in
, then
also needs to be in
.
The relation
(on
) in this question is indeed reflexive.
,
, and
(one pair for each element of
) are all elements of
.
isn't symmetric.
but
(the pairs in
are all ordered.) In other words,
isn't equivalent to
under
even though
.
Neither is
transitive.
and
. However,
. In other words, under relation
,
and
does not imply
.
Answer:
![1.20 x 10^{6}=1,200,000\\\\6.0 x 10^{5}=600,000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1.20%20x%2010%5E%7B6%7D%3D1%2C200%2C000%5C%5C%5C%5C6.0%20x%2010%5E%7B5%7D%3D600%2C000)
Step-by-step explanation:
You move the decimal place over 6 times for the first equation and 5 for the second equation.
Hope this helps! Have a great day! :)
Answer: Find the negative reciprocal of the slope of the original line and use the slope-intercept form y=mx+b to find the line perpendicular to y=1/5x−1. y=−5x−17
Answer:
Supplementary angles
x = 31
Step-by-step explanation:
Since, (3x + 25)° and 2x° are straight line angles. Therefore they are supplementary angles
(3x + 25)° + 2x° =180°
(5x + 25)° = 180°
5x + 25 = 180
5x = 180 - 25
5x = 155
x = 155/5
x = 31
This is easy, hint, you multiply ;-;