It is like a dug because there is a change in the brain cells that grow more adenosine receptors, which is the brain’s attempt to maintain equilibrium in the face of a constant onslaught of caffeine, with its adenosine receptors so regularly plugged. This explains why regular coffee drinkers build up a tolerance over time, it takes more caffeine to block a significant proportion of them and achieve the desired effect which is why it is so addicting. It is not as bad as a worse drug because the effects of caffeine <span>are relatively short-term.</span> Caffeine is a stimulant that affects the nervous system in various ways.
The number is 438 because if you round 30 to the nearest 10 then it is 40
and the 4 in 438 stays the same.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer