3/7
6 divided by 2 equals 3
14 divided by 2 equals 7
Thet contradict each other, that's why both of them are incorrect.
<span>Suppose that a polynomial has four roots: s, t, u, and v. If the polynomial were evaluated at any of these values, it would have to be zero. Therefore, the polynomial can be written in this form.
p(x)(x - s)(x - t)(x - u)(x - v), where p(x) is some non-zero polynomial
This polynomial has a degree of at least 4. It therefore cannot be cubic.
Now prove Kelsey correct. We have already proved that there can be no more than three roots. To prove that a cubic polynomial with three roots is possible, all we have to do is offer a single example of that. This one will do.
(x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)
This is a cubic polynomial with three roots, and four or more roots are not possible for a cubic polynomial. Kelsey is correct.
Incidentally, if this is a roller coaster we are discussing, then a cubic polynomial is not such a good idea, either for a vertical curve or a horizontal curve. I hope this helps</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Solving with one operation at each step:</u>
- {362 – [63 + (48 ÷ 2) x 2]} + 3(9 +4) =
- {362 – [63 + 24 x 2]} + 3(9 +4) =
- [362 – (63 + 48)] + 3(9 +4) =
- (362 – 111) + 3(9 +4) =
- 251 + 3(13) =
- 251 + 39 =
- 290
-3 + 3n = -6 - 6n. Expand the brackets
3n + 6n = -6 + 3. Collect like terms
9n = -3
n = -3/9 = -1/3
Answer:
a = $17.25
Step-by-step explanation:
let the money spend on the necklace be a
we have
15.75 +1.5*2 +a + 14 = 50
-> a = 50 -15.75 -3-14
-> a = $17.25
