Suppose that the external cost associated with chewing gum (sticky sidewalks) is 0.5 cents per packet chewed. Most economists wo
1 answer:
Answer:
Doing nothing. Ignore small external costs because the cost of administering a chewing gum tax is likely large relative to the harm prevented
Explanation:
As in the given question it can be seen that the external cost that is attached with the chewing cume would not even a cent as it is only 0.5 cents. Here the value is negligible if the tax is t be charged on this than it would not generate any revenue instead of this the cost of administrative would become high
Therefore the first option is correct
You might be interested in
Answer:
Current price = $20.50
Explanation:
Data provided in the question;
Growth rate, g = 20% = 0.2 for the 2 years
Growth rate, g' = 15% = 0.15 for the following 2 years
after 4 years annual dividend = $3
Last dividend paid, D0 = $1
Required rate of return, r = 12% = 0.12
Now,
D1 = D0 × (1 + g)
= $1 × (1 + 0.2)
= $1.2
D2 = $1 × (1 + 0.2)²
D3 = $1 × (1 + 0.2)² × (1 + 0.15)
D4 = $1 × (1 + 0.2)² × (1 + 0.15)²
D5 = 3
Therefore,
Current price = +
+
+
+
⇒ Current price = $20.50