If you don't own a home or a car, your liability is b. lower than one who owns both.
<h3>What is a Liability?</h3>
This refers to the legal state of a person who is responsible for something that is put in his care.
Hence, we can see that for a person that owns a car and house, the liability that he has is far higher than someone that does not own any of them.
Read more about liability here:
brainly.com/question/25687338
#SPJ1
Answer:
Poverty & Hunger
Explanation:
Hi there,
Poverty and hunger are widespread problems that have existed for a large portion of human history. Even before the pandemic, people were already struggling to feed their families and in some cases, starving. This problem is very widespread and even occurs in countries that are considered "developed".
This is just a suggestion! There can be other answers that are just as correct.
Hope this answer helps. Cheers.
Answer:
The correct option is a. $61.25.
Explanation:
Note: The correct cost function of the farmer is as follows:
C(Q) = 0.05Q^2 ……………….. (1)
Differentiating equation
MC = C’(Q) = 0.1Q
P = Expected price = (25% * $3) + (50% * $3.50) + (25% * $4) = $3.50 ……. (2)
Since profit is maximized when MC = P, we equate equations (1) and solve for Q which is the expected profit-maximizing quantity as follows:
0.1Q = 3.50
Q = 3.50 / 0.1 = 35
Substituting Q = 35 into equation (1), we have:
C(Q) = 0.05 * 35^2 = $61.25
R(Q) = Maximum expected revenue = P * Q = $3.50 * 350 = $122.50
The farmer's maximum expected profit = R(Q) - C(Q) = $122.50 - $61.25 = $61.25
Therefore, the correct option is a. $61.25.
Answer: income statement and the statement of cash flows
Explanation:
Answer:
$577 Unfavorable
Explanation:
The calculation of spending variance for dye costs is shown below:-
Spending variance for dye cost = (Standard rate - Actual variable) × Actual units
= ($0.67 - $13,910 ÷ 19,900) × 19,900
= (0.67 - 0.69899) × 19,900
= $577 Unfavorable
Therefore for computing the spending variance for dye costs we simply applied the above formula.
