Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
Answer:
<em>Technology education</em> includes teaching students <em>how technology changes the physical world in order to satisfy certain human needs</em>, for example, how ICT (Information and Communications Technology) changes the way people communicate between each other and exchange information.
For the <u>technology education to develop</u>, <u>the governmental and private sectors need to cooperate</u>, because the major advancement in technology happens in the private sector, while government is responsible to maintain educational standards.
For example, software development education is often blamed for being outdated and unable to keep up with the pace of IT industry advancement. In order to address this problem, the government should create and enforce practices for the educational institution to invite experts from the IT, as well as create an environment in which students would require work experience through internships in private IT companies.
I THINK A CONCENTRATING MORE ON TRADITIONAL VALUES BECAUSE OF WHAT I HAVE HEARD AND WHAT MY TEACHER HAVE SAID ABOUT THEM WHEN SHE WENT THERE
Answer:
B: Roman women had some legal rights and were able to attend public events whereas Greek women were more secluded.
Explanation:
In Greece, there was a contrast between two prominent city-states, Athens and Sparta. Athens did not look upon women as Sparta did. While Athens women were considered lower than slaves, Spartan women were independent and could even own property. Apart from those two cities, Greek women in general did not have any political clout. Married women could have some opinion over their husbands’ political views but they did not have any rights such as vote or hold political office. In fact, it was considered improper for a woman to discuss politics in a public setting. In most city-states, women were accompanied wherever they had to go; their main role was to give birth to children, particularly to male.
Roman women could shop, speak with friends, and visit temples without asking their husband for permission. During the years that Rome was an Empire, women gained more freedom and it was legal for women to own land, run businesses, free slaves, make wills, inherit wealth, and get paid jobs. In ancient Rome, only free adult men were citizens. Although women were not citizens of ancient Rome, they enjoyed a great deal more freedom than did women in ancient Greece.
In Rome
In general, Roman women enjoyed more freedom than women in Classical Athens.
