The problem with using John Gray's approach to resolving marital conflict is that the "Men from Mars, Women are from Venus" (1992) book <u>turns human psychology into stereotypes</u>. The fact that <u>men and women are not fundamentally different </u><u>was either ignored or underexamined</u> in Gray's approach and methodology.
According to Stephanie Coontz, imbalances of situated power in marriages are frequently mistaken or misinterpreted for "cultures" unique to each gender.
Coontz asserted that traditionalists who disagree with forward-thinking changes and progressive relationships are delusional because the family structure they hold dear is a passing relic.
Unlike Men from Mars, Women are from Venus, Coontz's writings have long asserted that the conventional or traditional nuclear families are frequently oppressive structure for women, that its decline, along with the rising acceptance of divorce, unmarried parenthood, domestic partnership, and LGBTQ unions, has been an empowering influence and must get public support.
Find out how many percent of the population, as the historian Stephanie Coontz points out, by 1978, thought that it was morally okay to be single and have children: brainly.com/question/15012453
#SPJ4
Answer:
self-perception
Explanation:
In the scenario being described, Ita's reaction is most consistent with the self-perception of attitudes theory. This theory states that when an individual is unsure about how their feelings and motivations towards something, they will usually use their own behavior to infer what exactly they are feeling. Which in this case Ita's behavior as she cried and hugged her father showed her that she actually cared for him a lot more than she thought.
Answer:
"identity vs. Role confusion" crisis. Right now, Mike is more inclined towards the "role confusion" side of it.
Explanation:
Erik Erikson proposed a theory about social and emotional development along people's lifespan. According to him, people go through different stages in life that are manifested as "crisis" where two different options present to the people and they create anxiety. Eventually, the person is inclined towards one of the two options available and solves the crisis and moves on to the next stage.
The fifth developmental stage in this theory is "Identity vs. Role confusion"
This stage occurs from about 12 to 18 years of age. During this stage, adolescents search for a sense of self and personal identity through the exploration of values and beliefs. It is during this stage that adolescents question themselves who they are and who they want to become.
If the adolescent fails to establish a sense of identity within society it can lead to role confusion which means not knowing what their place in society is.
In the example, we can see that <u>Mike says he wants to be a lawyer, however, her mom says that his interests change almost every week and she feels like he should attend some career guidance sessions.</u>
From Erik Erikson perspective, <u>Mike is going through the "identity vs. Role confusion" crisis</u>, which is a <u>normal stage of exploring, since he is only 14 years old he still has time to decide what he wants to be. </u>
Answer:
Before the general emancipation of American slaves during the Civil War, many secured their own freedom through escape, self-purchase, or being freed by the slaveholder.
Answer:
B. group cohesion and loyalty
Explanation:
Institutional collectivism cultural dimension refers to how much a certain groups want its member to integrate their personal identity to the groups, so every single members of the group could 'act as one entity'
For that to happen, group cohesion and loyalty need to exist within every members of the group.
<u>Groups cohesion</u> is the link that strengthen the bond between each members. Probably because they are facing the same experience in the past or come from similar background .<u>Group loyalty </u>refers to how much sacrifice that each members are willing to make for the groups' purpose.
