The correct answer is Rights View of Ethics.
<u>Rights-based ethics</u> is a concept whereby all humans have rights based only on the fact that they are human. These rights are natural rights (moral ones) and conventional rights as created by the society in which that person lives in (different values). The opposite of rights based ethics are<u> utilitarian ethics</u>, which are based on the maximization of "good outcomes" and minimizations of "bad outcomes." An example of a rights-based ethics is: The right to freely practice a religion of choice; an example of an utilitarian ethics is: that it would be acceptable to torture someone to gain information to save others as it would have a positive net outcome.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "unconditional positive regard
".
Explanation:
- A definition seems to be the behavior of unquestioning acceptance as well as affection, be it for oneself or another. Once you have absolute contempt for others, none that they can do will give you an excuse to avoid saw them as being simply human as well as affable.
- The principle is still the same but with a more precise intent: creating a healthy, trustworthy bond between the psychologist as well as the individual.
So that Charlene's father shows absolute positive regard for the efficiency.
Answer:
A nationalist is a person who strongly identifies with their own nation while a non nationalist is a person who does not involve the nation.
Explanation:
<u>Nationalist example:</u>
For example, during the Second World War, the Canadian government feared that Japanese Canadians would have contending nationalist loyalties between their homeland of Canada and their former homeland of Japan.
<u>Non Nationalist example:</u>
Friends are an example of a non-nationalist loyalty, but if you choose their friends because they come from another country and share another language and culture.
Answer:
melting pot
Explanation:
There was anti-immigration feeling in the American environment as immigrants were seen as a threat to social and economic opportunities. Melting pot is a metaphor used in American society to describe the cultural assimilation of different ethnicity and nationality. It represents that a heterogeneous society is transforming in a homogeneous one or vice versa.
It’s A right? That makes the most sense to me because duma is a legislative body of Russia, senate I don’t think so and I am positive it’s not Diet so the answer is A
