Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
Answer:
I believe it is a vote. Hope this helps! :)
When we say the Pledge of Allegiance we are giving loyalty to the United States of America
The official President of the Senate is the Vice-President. (https://www.senate.gov/reference/Index/Vice_President.htm) so that might lead to some conflict between the branches of government. Imagine if the President could order his deputy to decide who was on which committee or who could speak during a proceeding. The executive branch could shape the Senate by putting members of their party in positions of power even if they did not have a majority.
Well today woman and blacks are allowed to vote but back then they couldn't
