Answer:
The correct answer is C: likely that a court will allow the rescission based on a mistake of fact.
Explanation:
Brian was not aware of that fact that the horse is incapable of breeding at the point he buys it, but Larson assures Brian the horse is healthy. In this light, if Brian sues to cancel the contract with Larson, the court will allow it based on a mistake of fact. This way the court will reduce any civil liability or criminal culpability because Larson might not know that the horse cannot breed, although he is certain that the horse is healthy.
I believe it really depends on the situation. When you are looking for a job, I think that IQ is definitely more important because you have to show your skills and knowledge. But once you've landed the job, everyone around you will have more or less the same IQ level as you. So this is where EQ comes into the picture. Not all people in your workplace will have the same EQ which means that it can have a significant effect on your success within your company, and afterwards, in life.
Answer:
-2
Explanation:
To solve this question we can use Lerner's equation or Lerner's index which gives the relationship between elasticity of demand and profit maximizing cost and marginal cost:
Replacing 
Then we get that the elasticity of demand is 
Answer:
Explanation:
Corporate level tax on $200,000 is $61,250
Cash(After Corporate tax)= 
Individual tax on $138,750(15%)=
Hence, net after tax cashflow :
<span>The issue here is whether Tracy had enough to drink that would cause him to be mentally incapacitated. If Tracy was mentally incapacitated, the contract would be rendered unenforceable and thus, Tracy would not need to honor the contract and vice versa. However, if Tracy cannot show this, the contract will likely be upheld.</span>
