Answer:
Bank Reconciliation Statement as of October 31
Particulars Amount Particulars Amount
Balance as per bank $350 Balance as per books $806
Add: Late deposit $433 Less: Returned checks $80
Less: Outstanding check $66 Less: Error recordings $9
($24+$42) ($65-$56)
Reconciled Balance $717 Reconciled Balance $717
Answer: Entrepreneurial ability
Explanation:
A. Capital in the business can be defined as the money invested for the operations of business to earn profits. Capital can be in form of any kind of money like shares and debt but a human can never be a capital.
B. Land can be defined as the capital investment of the business for the place where which the operations of the business will be maintained.
C. Entrepreneurial ability is the brain behind the business entity . In a business an entrepreneur is the person who collects capital, purchase land and maintains the operations.
D. Labor is the human capital invested in the business, that is, hiring of individuals for different types of operations.
Hence we can conclude that Cecil Rhodes played entrepreneurial ability.
Answer:
35000
A, d
Explanation:
Reserve requirement is the portion of deposit received by banks that the central bank requires to be kept as deposit.
If $3500 is deposited and reserve requirement is 10%
reserves would increase by $3500 x 0.10 = $350
Increase in the total value of checkable deposit is determined by the money multiplier
Money multiplier = amount deposited / reserve requirement
3500 / 0.1 = 35000
If the banks keep excess reserves, the amount of money available to be loaned out would reduce and this would reduce the increase in money supply.
Also, if individuals keep the money at home, it would reduce the amount of money that can be loaned out by banks
Answer:
A. the double coincidence of wants problem.
Explanation:
Trade by barter involves the exchange of goods and services for goods and services without the use of money as a medium of exchange. In barter system, there is what we call double coincidence of wants. This is the economic situation whereby both parties holds what the other wants to buy, so they exchange the goods directly. Here, both parties agrees to buy and sell each other commodities. However, if one of the party is not interested in what the other party is offering, it causes a disruption in the trade. This disruption refers to a drawback in the system like the example described in the question.
Here, Andy couldn't make a deal with Danny even tho he wants what Danny is offering. This is because what Danny isn't interested in what Andy is offering. Thus, the double coincidence of want and barter trade can't occur between the two parties.
