Answer:
The concept of checks and balances.
Explanation:
All three sides of the government have a way to curb the power of the other 2 sides. This refers to checks and balances. The exec. branch has the veto and pardon, congress has the impeachment, and the supreme court has the right to remove congression acts.
Answer:
It would have been even more scarce
Explanation:
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
The stock market crashed a little after Hoover took office and the Great Depression became the central issue of his presidency. Hoover pursued a variety of policies in an attempt to lift the economy but opposed directly involving the federal government in relief efforts.
I don't know but imma give it a try.
To be ready for anything at all times.
To read everything without skipping over stuff.
To follow threw without out skipping a beat.
