It is true to say that driving depends on the driver's perception, vision, hearing and vision, drastically reducing these capacities is not a legitimate tendency decision.
<h3>What is driving perception?</h3>
It corresponds to the fact that the driver is aware of all the risks associated with the driving experience, obtaining information to increase their education and traffic safety, making the driving experience safer for all citizens.
Therefore, drastically reducing the ability to drive safely does not correspond to a legitimate tendency decision, which must be guided by theoretical and practical knowledge on the subject.
Find out more about safety driving here:
brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ1
This statement is false. B.F. Skinner is not responsible for establishing the law effect instead he developed a science philosophy called radical behaviorism. On the other hand, Edgar L. Thorndike was the one who developed this law. Ins
Answer:
C) United States expansion was acceptable so long as it stayed out of Mexico and Canada.
Explanation:
The ideology of the Manifest of destiny belonged to the mid-nineteenth century American belief that the United States is destined by the Almighty to spread the ideas of democracy and capitalism to the entire continent. This was used as justification for the forced removal of native Indians but it also created sectional differences over the issue of slavery. The territorial settlement with Canada and Mexico sidelined these countries fro the above-mentioned ideology.
<span>1. </span>People
in that country can do whatever they want because they are free to do so.
<span>2. </span>The
result is lack of discipline and the government will not do anything about it,
<span>3. </span><span>The
people has the power to chose who will govern the country and this situation can
be manipulated by offering money especially in underprivileged areas.</span>
A precedent is a principle or
rule in court wherein a previous legal case is used to decide on subsequent
cases with similar issues or facts. This is called stare decisis, a principle
wherein judges use precedents for their decision.
