1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
3 years ago
10

Brian researched how a person's intelligence quotient (IQ) is affected by exercise. First, people took an IQ test. Then, over 2

months, they did different amounts of exercise. Then, Brian gave them a second IQ test. What is the response variable in this experiment
Social Studies
1 answer:
kati45 [8]3 years ago
4 0

The question is incomplete and the full version can be found online.  

Answer: The change in IQ score from the first to second test

Explanation:

In an experiment, the response variable is the purpose of the question that is being made, while the explanatory variable is the one that has an effect over the response variable, meaning that it explains any changes in it.

If Brian is examining the effect that exercise might have on a person's intelligence quotient (IQ), the question he´s making is: does exercising change IQ results? Therefore, the change in IQ is the response variable. The amount of exercise is the explanatory variable, and the experiment aims to determine whether or not it has an effect on the response variable.

Incorrect options: The number of people in the study is the sample under study, not the response variable. The first IQ test score would be one indicator of the variable, not the variable itself. And the amount of exercise the people do is the explanatory variable, not the response variable.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements would qualify for a defamation action (assuming the statement is false)? a. "All corporate typ
german

Answer:

c. "Jones pled guilty to a violation of campaign contribution laws"

Explanation:

A defamation constitutes false statement of fact that exposes a person to damages in the form of hatred, ridicule, or contempt, or causes loss to his business.

In the above statement, a false statement is made against Jones which could highly damage Jones's reputation. Notice also that it is specific as it a refers to "Jones" unlike the other options in the question.

7 0
3 years ago
List four ways that Europeans ran colonies?
Svetlanka [38]
I know one, the Europeans generally exploited natives in every one of their colonies.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When presenting lineups to eyewitnesses, it has been found that a(n) ____ lineup is much more likely to result in an innocent pe
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

Simultaneous

Explanation:

The simultaneous line up is the line up in which a person witness s based on relative judgment. In this, the person compares the photographs and the lineup person. On this basis, the witness makes the judgment. It is the phenomena in which witness identify the innocent people. But it decreases the false identification of innocent people.  

Thus here in the above context, the researcher has been used simultaneous lineup for identification of the criminal. This is in a result of much more likely to identify the innocent people.  

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following terms and braces idea that the United States had the right to control the North American continent
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

B) Manifest destiny.

Explanation:

The Manifest Destiny is a concept, arduously followed in the 19th century, that sees it´s the right, the natural destiny of the United States to expand accross the continent until the shores of the Pacific. Such an outcome is God´s will, as geography, circumstances and history all favor the United States. It was a major drive of expansion for a good part of the century until it was fulfilled with victory in the Mexican-American War and the territories taken from Mexico.

8 0
3 years ago
Pollution is the price of progress."" Is this assertion correct? What is meant by ""progress""? Who in fact pays the price? Expl
satela [25.4K]

Answer:Yes,It is true that pollution is the price for progress

Explanation:The assertion that pollution is the price for progress is valid.

1. Progress in this regards simply means development or improvement either on the environment or a particular thing.

2. It is the people that pays the price

The moral of this assertion is that for any development to take place,the people must pay the price,this may be through inconveniences,land pollution e.t.c

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Expressive violence refers to an act of violence involving
    8·1 answer
  • Tell tale heart how do you account for the police officers chatting calmly with the murderer instead of reacting to the sound th
    11·1 answer
  • How would you define the anti-immigrants position
    12·1 answer
  • What are the properties that a human would need to be able to survive in harsh or different environments
    7·1 answer
  • According to the video ‘ Piaget’s Stage of Development’ in Task 4, what is a clear indication that a learner has reached the for
    5·1 answer
  • if two restaurants sell many of the same food items but one offers a higher level of service, the service distinction is a form
    15·1 answer
  • 8
    9·1 answer
  • In what way did Georgia contribute to World War I most?
    10·1 answer
  • Why do countries close to the US charge more for offshoring than other countries?
    6·1 answer
  • Classified information can be safeguarded by using:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!