If a winning Presidential candidate dies or becomes incapacitated between the counting of electoral votes in Congress and the inauguration, the Vice President elect will become President, according to Section 3 of the 20th Amendment.
I believe your answer would be eros type, I had this question before but Ican't remember which one was correct, plz tell me if I am wrong.
As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
Answer:
The answer is B- Group contingencies
Explanation:
The options are
a. controlled peer pressure.
b. group contingencies.
c. joint goal enforcement.
d. All of the other answers are correct
The answer is B- Group contingencies
A group contingency is a behavior management protocol where a single consequence is given based on either the behavior to a particular set of people within the group or as a whole. It specifies the relationship between the completion of a given task and access to a specific reward. It has been found to be effective in classrooms because it helps to monitor the behavior o students, it promotes peer encouragement and reinforcement.
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
A set of attitudes, beliefs, and practices that are sued to justify the belief that one racial category is somehow superior or inferior to others.
Whenever someone is treated differently, due to the person origin, or on the basis of gender, sex, religious affiliation, age, etc.
It can happen against groups , as also for racial or ethnical reasons.
Prejudiced action against a group of people
If a person belongs to a social class or category and he is treated based on prejudice and discriminated then he is victim of racism.
The flawed assumptions about a group of people usually stem from ignorance and result in acts of violence and intolerance that lead to tensions.
--biased thought based on flawed assumptions about a group of people
Perhaps the Holocaust, remains the iconic and extreme form of discrimination as Jews a group of people were subject to deprival of human rights and reduced to endure the extremes than one could ever imagine.
